Blog

Grant management: the ultimate guide for nonprofits, research institutions, hospitals, and public agencies

Q: Grant Tracking vs. Grant Management: what’s the difference?

Grant management encompasses the entire lifecycle of a grant, from identifying opportunities and applying, to managing funds, reporting, and closeout. Grant tracking , on the other hand, is the continuous monitoring layer within that lifecycle. It focuses on documenting progress, logging budgets, meeting deadlines, and ensuring compliance at every stage.

Grant management is a complex process that requires nonprofits, foundations, and public agencies to balance funding compliance, deadlines, and strategic impact. Without the right systems, organizations risk losing funding or damaging their credibility. This guide explores how adopting a Project Portfolio Management (PPM) mindset and tools like Triskell can help achieve transparency, efficiency, and better decision-making in grant tracking.

In this post, you will learn:

What grant management is and how to structure the process from pre-award to closeout.
Why integrating grant tracking into a PPM platform improves visibility and compliance.
How to manage financial tracking, multi-year grants, and restricted funds effectively.
Best practices to centralize data, define roles, and ensure audit readiness.

What is grant management?

Grant management is the proactive process of monitoring and overseeing the entire lifecycle of each grant. This covers everything from the moment an organization identifies a funding opportunity to the final closeout and record retention, including aspects such as:

Application deadlines.
Eligibility requirements.
Budget allocations.
Spending patterns.
Deliverable timelines.
Reporting obligations.
Compliance documentation.
Etc.

So, it’s not just about knowing where the money goes. It’s about managing the entire process with visibility, control, and consistency.

PROJECT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

Manage all your grants from a single source of truth

Go beyond tracking. Use Triskell’s PPM solution to plan, prioritize, and control every grant-funded project within one unified system.

Each grant comes with its own set of funder requirements, budget categories, allowable expenses, reporting schedules, and performance metrics. Without a modern system for managing and tracking grants, the consequences can be severe. For example:

A missed interim report can trigger funding holds.
Expenses charged to the wrong grant code can create compliance violations.
Underspending in one category while overspending in another may require complex budget modification requests.

These operational failures can lead to consequences that jeopardize future funding opportunities and damage the organization’s reputation. That’s why a PPM tool provides a comprehensive view of the entire grant portfolio: submitted applications, approved funds, pending deliverables, spending pace, and performance metrics, all centralized in one place.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Get stories like this in your inbox

Why should you integrate grant tracking into a comprehensive PPM tool?

Managing dozens or even hundreds of grant applications as most organizations do, with spreadsheets, CRM tools, and standalone accounting systems isn’t just counterproductive: it’s inefficient.

PPM solutions like Triskell provide the structure, scalability, and insight that NGOs, hospitals, public agencies and research centers need to manage their grant portfolios with confidence and transparency.

The benefits of integrating grant management into a PPM software are significant:

Real-time visibility: get a complete picture of all applications, including their budgets, timelines, and risks.
Workflow automation: automate tasks (approval routes, alerts, and notifications) so that grant management staff can focus on higher-value activities.
Confidence in compliance: every decision and change is tracked, with version control ensuring all transactions, documents, and actions are fully recorded.
Strategic alignment: connect and measure the impact of each grant against organizational objectives, making decision-making easier and more informed.

Excel vs Triskell for Grant Management & Tracking: a comparison table

Feature / Process	Excel	Triskell
Data management	Multiple disconnected files.	Centralized, real-time repository.
Version control	Manual updates; error-prone.	Automatic tracking with full audit trail.
Workflow management	No automation.	Automated approvals, alerts, and notifications.
Compliance	High risk of missing deadlines or misallocations.	Built-in control mechanisms and reporting templates.
Visibility	Difficult to consolidate.	Portfolio dashboards for financial and program performance.
Financial tracking	Manual reconciliations.	Integrated with accounting for real-time expense tracking.
Scalability	Suitable only for small teams.	Supports complex, multi-grant environments.

Triskell Case Study – ADM

With more than 150 active R&D projects per year and over 60,000 working hours to track, ADM needed to secure and streamline time management related to the French R&D Tax Credit (CIR) program.

Before Triskell: tracking was done in Excel, which led to consolidation issues, limited project visibility, and extensive manual follow-ups.

With Triskell:

Monthly procedures for time entry and validation.
Full autonomy for R&D teams in project creation and resource management.
Real-time consolidation of hours and activities.
Reports aligned with CIR regulatory requirements.
Simplified governance and reliable, audit-ready data.

Read the Case Studies

The Grant Management process step by step

But before we dive into how PPM software can help you manage grants more efficiently, let’s first look at how the process works.

As we’ve mentioned, managing grants effectively isn’t just about securing funding; it’s about coordinating a series of interconnected processes so that each application can turn into measurable results.

Each of the four stages in this lifecycle requires systems designed to capture the right information at the right time. Let’s break down what each phase of the grant management process involves.

1. Pre-Award: research, eligibility, and applications

The pre-award phase is when organizations identify promising funding opportunities, evaluate them, and prioritize them based on a series of criteria.

During this phase, the main goal is to ensure the strategic alignment of each proposal with the organization’s mission, as well as to:

Ensure internal resources are available to develop a competitive application.
Confirm the organization’s capacity to successfully execute the proposed project if funded.

For this process, organizations should have a centralized system where they can record potential opportunities as they arise. This includes entering all relevant details about the funding announcement into a unified application form that captures:

Name of the funder and program.
Total available funding.
Expected award sizes.
Eligibility requirements.
Priority populations or geographic areas.
Permitted activities and restrictions.
Application deadline.
Letters of intent.
Key contacts within the funding agency.

When preparing the application, it should be as detailed as possible. That means assigning staff to specific sections or tasks, gathering all required documentation, setting internal deadlines for review before submission, and coordinating any necessary approvals from executives or the board.

After submission, the system should also record when the application was sent, any revisions or changes made, and all follow-up communications with funders.

Centralizing the entire eligibility and submission process within a single platform not only makes the process more organized and transparent but also makes proposals far more competitive. Because effective pre-award tracking doesn’t just help you apply for more grants: it helps you compete strategically for the ones that truly matter.

2. Award phase: contracts, budgets, and deliverables

The award phase begins once a grant has been officially approved under specific terms and conditions. During this stage, special attention must be paid to capturing all the details and requirements defined by the funder. This includes:

The awarded amount, which may differ from the amount requested and require budget adjustments.
The performance period, which defines when activities can begin and when they must be completed.
Allowable costs.
Budget categories with spending limits.
Applicable indirect cost rate.
Matching or cost-sharing requirements.
And other financial conditions.

Beyond financial terms, the grant agreement also specifies programmatic obligations, such as deliverables, performance goals, measurement requirements, reporting schedules, and conditions that must be met before funds are released or renewed.

All these details should be extracted from the award documents and entered into a grant tracking or a PPM tool where they can be monitored. Each approved grant should be registered under a unique grant code. It’s also advisable that your tracking system be configured to alert financial managers when spending in any category approaches its limit.

Likewise, project planning activities during the award phase should also be recorded, such as:

A detailed project roadmap with milestones and decision points.
Defined roles and responsibilities for all project components.
Any required procurement activities.
Sub-grants or partner contracts that need to be established.
Internal review meetings to monitor progress.

DEMAND MANAGEMENT

Take control of your grant pipeline with Triskell

Discover how Triskell helps you capture, qualify, and prioritize grant applications that truly align with your mission.

Post-Award: reporting, monitoring, and compliance

This phase represents the longest and most complex stage of grant management. During it, organizations must simultaneously monitor financial performance, program progress, and compliance with all grant terms and conditions.

As expenses are incurred, they should be properly recorded in the tracking system in order to:

Compare actual expenditures against the budgeted amounts in each category.
Calculate the percentage of budget consumed vs. time elapsed.
Identify any variances that may require management attention or budget revisions.
Ensure that every expense is backed by the appropriate documentation.

Many funders also require reports describing program activities and results. Therefore, a detailed record should be kept of:

The status of planned activities and deliverables.
Project performance data according to the established measurement plan.
Any deviations from the approved project plan that may require funder notification or approval.

Finally, during this phase, organizations must ensure full adherence to all grant terms and conditions. Expenses must be correctly categorized, and all required reports and notifications must be submitted on time, in the correct format, and to the appropriate recipients.

Grant closeout: final reports and record retention

Finally, the closeout phase marks the official completion of the grant. The goal is to ensure that all obligations have been fully met and properly documented. This stage typically involves three main activities:

Activity	Actions
Financial reconciliation	Verify that all expenses have been recorded and fall within the approved budget limits. Identify any unspent funds that must be returned to the funder. Ensure that all invoices and reimbursement requests have been submitted and paid. Prepare a final financial report accounting for every euro of grant funding.
Final Program Report	Prepare a comprehensive report that includes: Project activities and accomplishments. Quantitative data on performance metrics and outcomes achieved. Challenges encountered and lessons learned. Documentation of any materials produced, such as curricula, tools, or publications.
Documentation and record retention	Compile and organize all records related to the grant, including: The original application and award documents. All approved amendments and modifications. Invoices, receipts, and payment documentation. All correspondence with the funder. All submitted reports.

Activity

Actions

Financial reconciliation

Verify that all expenses have been recorded and fall within the approved budget limits.
Identify any unspent funds that must be returned to the funder.
Ensure that all invoices and reimbursement requests have been submitted and paid.
Prepare a final financial report accounting for every euro of grant funding.

Final Program Report

Prepare a comprehensive report that includes:

Project activities and accomplishments.
Quantitative data on performance metrics and outcomes achieved.
Challenges encountered and lessons learned.
Documentation of any materials produced, such as curricula, tools, or publications.

Documentation and record retention

Compile and organize all records related to the grant, including:

The original application and award documents.
All approved amendments and modifications.
Invoices, receipts, and payment documentation.
All correspondence with the funder.
All submitted reports.

Once all these activities are complete, the grant’s status should be updated in the system to “Closed”, while retaining all historical data. Most grant agreements specify how long records must be kept (typically between three and seven years).

Ready to see how Triskell streamlines grant management?

Request a demo today and discover how Triskell helps nonprofits and public agencies centralize, track, and report on every grant in one intuitive platform.

The Importance of financial tracking in grant management

As you’ve seen throughout the four stages of the process, financial tracking is the most critical and complex aspect of grant management. Award contracts often impose strict, detailed rules regarding the use of funds and financial reporting. And the consequences of noncompliance can be severe.

Budgets for grants managed by nonprofits, research entities, healthcare organizations, and public institutions are typically divided into several categories:

Personnel: salaries and benefits.
Travel, equipment, supplies, and materials.
Contractual costs (consultants, subrecipients).
Indirect or overhead costs.

Each category has clearly defined spending limits that cannot be exceeded without the funder’s authorization. That’s why integrating your PPM software with the accounting system is so valuable: all actual expenses (payroll, invoices, reimbursements, etc.) are automatically recorded in the grant expense reports, ensuring that your financial data is always up to date.

Moreover, every expense must be supported by documentation proving that:

It was necessary for the project.
It is permitted under the grant terms.
It was approved in accordance with internal policies.

The system should link each transaction to its supporting documentation (invoices, receipts, timesheets, procurement records) to simplify audits and ensure full traceability.

However, effective financial tracking goes far beyond comparing total spending against the remaining budget. There are additional parameters that organizations must monitor. Let’s look at the most important ones below.

1. Expected spending trajectory

If you only look at total spending and remaining budget, you could draw misleading conclusions. For instance, imagine a grant that has spent 60% of its budget in just one year — that might seem excessive. But with a deeper analysis, you might discover that this spending pattern is appropriate because it reflects upfront equipment purchases or early-stage staffing costs.

That’s why having a system that allows you to forecast spending trajectories is essential. These projections should reflect the planned activity timeline, so you can compare actual expenses against expected spending patterns rather than static budget figures.

2. Variance analysis and budget modifications

Variance analysis is key not only for detecting budget deviations but also for understanding their root causes.

Is the variance due to something minor — like a delay in hiring staff?
Or does it reflect a more fundamental shift in project needs that requires a budget modification?

Some variances may require formal budget revision requests to the funder. That’s why the system should automatically flag variances that exceed defined thresholds and trigger workflows to investigate and resolve them efficiently.

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Gain total financial control of your grant portfolio with Triskell

Track budgets, expenditures, and multi-year funds effortlessly with Triskell’s integrated Financial Management capabilities.

Managing multi-year grants and restricted funds

Another important consideration is that many grants span multiple years, making financial tracking far more complex because their financial impact extends beyond a single fiscal period.

According to accounting standards, the total grant income must be recognized at the time of award, even if the funds are spent over several years. This often creates a familiar anomaly: programs showing a surplus in the first year, followed by deficits in subsequent years.

To effectively manage multi-year grants, organizations should:

Comply with accounting standards while maintaining a realistic view of financial health.
Produce multi-year reports showing total awarded amount, cumulative spending, remaining balance, and current year execution.
Clearly communicate to leadership that future “deficits” represent planned use of previously recognized funds.

Restricted funds require an even tighter level of control, as funders set very specific limits on how funds can be used — by program, location, time period, or activity type. Misuse of restricted funds is both an ethical and legal violation.

Fund accounting principles provide the framework to track restricted funds properly. Instead of pooling all organizational money together, fund accounting segregates funds based on their restrictions. Each restricted grant becomes its own fund with distinct financial records. The organization’s chart of accounts must be structured to support this segregation, typically through fund codes or accounting segments that identify which fund each transaction belongs to.

Your tracking system should support this structure by enabling:

Expense coding that links each transaction to its corresponding fund.
Validation rules that prevent accidental charges to the wrong fund.
Fund-specific financial reports that demonstrate compliance with all restrictions.

Best practices for effective grant management

Now that we have covered the financial and operational complexities of grants, it´s time to focus now on the practices that sustain long-term success. The following best practices will help your organization strengthen compliance, improve collaboration, and gain full visibility over every project and funder relationship.

Centralize all grant information in a single system

Today, for any organization managing grants, whether a foundation, hospital, research center, or public agency, centralizing all information within a single system is essential to operate efficiently and maintain compliance.

When data is scattered across emails, spreadsheets, network folders, or isolated systems, that’s when problems start to appear:

No complete visibility into the current status of grants.
Chaos in version control for budgets and documents.
Frequent duplication of work and data entry.
Increased risk of errors and omissions due to the lack of a single source of truth.

By centralizing all your data in one platform, every team in your organization has a single point of reference for recording and accessing information. And a PPM software like Triskell provides the structure and infrastructure your organization needs to plan, manage, and monitor its grant portfolio. All while staying aligned with your broader strategic goals.

Triskell acts as a centralized repository where you can record your entire pipeline of funding opportunities, approved budgets, reports, performance metrics, contracts, correspondence, and supporting documentation. It also includes:

Secure cloud storage and remote access.
Granular permissions to protect sensitive information.
Advanced search and powerful filtering tools.
Integration with accounting and other business systems.
Audit logs to track changes and maintain transparency.

PROJECT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

See the bigger picture of your grant portfolio with Triskell

Discover how Triskell’s PPM solution helps you manage grants, projects, and resources holistically.

Define roles, responsibilities, and internal controls

As an organization’s grant portfolio grows, it becomes increasingly important to define and distribute responsibilities across different roles within the team. For example:

Role	Responsibilities
Grant Manager / Program Officer	Oversee daily operations. Coordinate different award proposals. Serve as the main liaison with funders.
Financial Controllers	Manage budget setup. Monitor spending and financial performance. Ensure reporting accuracy and compliance.
Program Managers / Project Directors	Track the progress of tasks and deliverables. Collect performance data. Manage project teams.
Executive Leadership	Approve key strategic decisions. Engage with funders at a high level.

Beyond assigning roles and responsibilities, organizations must also develop written procedures that clearly define:

Which grant opportunities to pursue.
Requirements for proposal review and approval prior to submission.
How budgets are developed and approved.
The process for setting up new grants in the system.
Who has the authority to approve different types of expenses.
How frequently financial and programmatic monitoring occurs.
Requirements for reviewing and approving reports before submission.
The closeout process, including final reconciliation and documentation.

These procedures also function as internal controls, helping to separate duties so that no single individual manages all aspects of a grant, minimizing conflicts of interest. They also help establish approval hierarchies for spending thresholds and define regular review cadences for budgets and variance analysis.

Use multi-project dashboards to monitor spending

If your organization manages multiple grants at once, you need a consolidated view of your entire portfolio. Multi-project dashboards provide that strategic perspective by integrating data from different grants and displaying key trends at a glance.

Within the Triskell solution, you can configure a variety of dashboards to monitor different aspects of your grant programs. This way, every stakeholder — whether an executive, financial controller, or program director — has access to the information they need, when they need it.

For more information on everything Triskell dashboards have to offer, we recommend reading this article on our blog:

10 examples of PMO dashboards for Project Management

Financial dashboards

Provide a high-level overview of the financial health of each grant project or the overall portfolio. With them, you can:

Visualize grant revenue by fiscal year, with projections.
Monitor actual vs. budgeted expenditures.
Forecast projected cash flow based on payments and disbursements.
Analyze spending distribution by main categories.
Detect significant budget variances.

Programmatic dashboards

In addition to financial views, Triskell also allows you to set up dashboards that visualize:

Aggregated outcomes and key performance indicators (clients served, goals achieved).
Geographic distribution of programs.
Progress toward strategic priorities.
The pipeline of new applications.
Grants nearing their expiration date that may require renewal.

Operational dashboards

You can also create dashboards to monitor daily operations and the overall health of your programs, including:

Upcoming deadlines sorted by urgency.
Compliance indicators.
Staff allocation and workload balance.
Resource utilization and available capacity.

Ensure your documentation Is audit-ready

To be fully prepared for an audit, documentation must be complete, organized, and easily accessible. In addition, every transaction, contract, and communication should be stored within the corresponding grant record. Document versioning should be automated and timestamped to ensure that no record is lost or overwritten.

Here are some best practices you can implement in Triskell to maintain audit-ready documentation:

Create a record or object for each grant, with a consistent list of components (contracts, reports, budgets, etc.).
Link documents to milestones or deliverables within the system.
Retain all files for the period required by funders or regulatory bodies (usually between 5 and 7 years).
Conduct annual internal audits to verify that all data, documents, and workflows are complete.

Conclusion: Streamlining grant management and tracking with Triskell

Managing a grant is not just another administrative task. It’s a strategic discipline that demands transparency, financial accountability, and a clear sense of purpose. And with the right culture and tools, it’s absolutely achievable.

However, when it comes to grant management and tracking, having a tool that only monitors deadlines and budgets isn’t enough. You need a comprehensive solution that connects every grant to your organization’s strategic goals, financial governance, and performance metrics.

Triskell is a PPM software designed for project and portfolio management that enables nonprofits, foundations, hospitals, research institutions, and public entities to…

Centralize data and documents throughout the entire grant lifecycle.
Automate workflows and strengthen internal controls.
Link financial tracking directly to performance indicators.
Visualize portfolio progress through customizable dashboards tailored to each organizational role.

With Triskell, the time spent searching through and filling out spreadsheets can now be redirected toward designing better programs, strengthening relationships with funders, and achieving stronger alignment with your organization’s mission.

Request a demo of Triskell Software

See how Triskell’s PPM solution connects strategy, project management and product management in one platform. Request your personalized demo today.

FAQ – Grant Management & tracking

For more information on Grant Management, what resources can you consult?

For more information on Grant Management and Project Portfolio Management, we are sure you will find these articles useful:

How to prioritize projects: best criteria and techniques for effective project prioritization.
CAPEX vs OPEX: strategies for managing budgeting in IT Projects.
10 ESG KPIs and metrics you must track in your projects.
The ultimate guide to Scenario Analysis for PPM: how it works, examples, techniques and tools.
What is Demand Management? The definitive guide for your IT department.
15 process improvement examples with a PPM solution.
What is Project Portfolio Management (PPM) software? The ultimate guide.
Excel vs PPM Software? Which is the best option for Project Portfolio Management?

Grant Tracking vs. Grant Management: what’s the difference?

Grant management encompasses the entire lifecycle of a grant, from identifying opportunities and applying, to managing funds, reporting, and closeout.
Grant tracking, on the other hand, is the continuous monitoring layer within that lifecycle. It focuses on documenting progress, logging budgets, meeting deadlines, and ensuring compliance at every stage.

How can automation improve efficiency in grant management?

Automation brings structure and speed to every stage of the grant lifecycle. Instead of manually tracking deadlines, approvals, or reports, automated workflows handle repetitive tasks, from sending reminders and routing approvals to updating budgets and generating reports.

It also gives teams the freedom to focus on strategic priorities — evaluating impact, nurturing funder relationships, and aligning projects with organizational goals.

What are the biggest challenges in grant management, and how can technology help to address them?

Many organizations, from nonprofits and public agencies to R&D-driven enterprises, struggle with scattered data, manual tracking, and a lack of visibility across projects. Managing multiple grants often means juggling deadlines, budgets, and compliance requirements in disconnected systems, a recipe for errors and inefficiency.

Modern PPM solutions like Triskell solve these challenges by centralizing information, automating workflows, and connecting financial and performance data in one place. With real-time dashboards and automated alerts, teams can stay ahead of deadlines, ensure compliance, and make data-driven decisions that strengthen both accountability and impact.