Blog

Stakeholder management in project management: processes and best practices

For a project to succeed, every project management professional knows the essential ingredients: clear processes and methodologies, a well-defined scope, and concrete delivery dates.

However, why do so many projects still fail or stall? In many cases, the answer does not lie in technical execution, but in how expectations and working dynamics among people are managed. After all, projects come to life and move forward thanks to people.

Stakeholder management is one of the most undervalued yet critical aspects in Project and Portfolio Management. In this article, we’ll explore the key components of this process and how it can make the difference between a successful project and one that falls short.

What is stakeholder management?

Stakeholder management is the process of identifying, analyzing, and engaging all individuals, groups, and work areas that have an interest in a project or will be affected by it.

It’s not simply about creating a checklist of stakeholder names to send periodic updates. Rather, it’s about:

Understanding their expectations.
Anticipating their concerns.
Building strong relationships that support project objectives.

In other words, it’s about ensuring that stakeholders feel heard, respected, and engaged throughout the journey.

PROJECT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

Get full control of your project portfolios

See how Triskell’s PPM solution connects strategy, execution, and stakeholder management in one platform.

And, as you’ll see in this article, this requires a structured approach. On one side, leveraging tools such as stakeholder mapping, prioritization models, and communication plans. On the other hand, fostering a more human-centered management style built on collaboration, trust, and transparency. Only by integrating both dimensions can you design a truly effective stakeholder management plan that drives project success.

Types of stakeholders in project management

In project management, the number of stakeholders to consider is significant. Moreover, not all of them need, or want, the same level of involvement. Mapping who they are, what they need, and how much influence they hold is key when designing a strategy that actively engages them and prevents blind spots or costly conflicts.

To start, we can classify stakeholders into two main groups: internal and external.

Internal stakeholders

Internal stakeholders are individuals within the organization who are directly involved in the project. They typically have access to information, decision-making authority, and the ability to influence resources.

Some examples of internal stakeholders include:

Stakeholder	Description
Project sponsors	Provide funding and high-level strategic direction.
Executives and Senior Management	Ensure alignment with organizational objectives.
Project managers	Accountable for project deadlines, deliverables, and outcomes.
Project team members	Directly responsible for executing day-to-day tasks.
Department Heads / Functional Managers	Impacted when projects affect their teams or workflows.
Board of Directors	Oversee governance and ensure projects support long-term goals.
Employees	Especially those whose roles may change as a result of the project.
Internal investors or shareholders	They are interested in ROI and the financial performance of projects.

External stakeholders

External stakeholders, on the other hand, are individuals or groups outside the organization who, while not part of the PMO or the project team, may be affected by project outcomes or influence its success. They often bring unique perspectives and specific expectations that must also be addressed.

Stakeholder	Description
Customers	Concerned with the quality, value, and timeliness of deliverables.
End users	Directly interact with the product, service, or system developed.
Suppliers and vendors	Provide essential resources, services, or technology for the project.
Contractors and external partners	External collaborators directly involved in project execution.
Regulatory bodies and government agencies	Ensure compliance with legal, safety, or environmental standards.
Non-operational investors	Primarily focused on financial outcomes.
Local communities or interest groups	Impacted by the social or environmental effects of project deliverables.
General public	Especially relevant for projects with high visibility or public significance, such as civic or infrastructure initiatives.

Benefits of stakeholder management

Understanding what stakeholder management is and identifying who the stakeholders are is only the beginning. When PMOs and Project Managers manage stakeholders effectively, they create conditions for smoother collaboration, stronger support, and higher project success rates.

These are the most relevant benefits of stakeholder management:

Clearer expectations and fewer misunderstandings: stakeholder management provides a structured framework to define and align expectations and requirements from the outset, and to review them periodically. This reduces last-minute surprises, and keeps teams focused on delivering real value.
Stronger relationships and higher stakeholder commitment: every project thrives on trust. When stakeholders feel heard and included, the likelihood increases not only that they will support the project, but also that they will actively champion it within the organization. This sense of ownership often translates into faster approvals, easier access to resources, and stronger commitment when challenges arise.
Better decision-making and problem-solving: stakeholders bring diverse perspectives, experiences, and expertise. Actively involving them fosters a collaborative environment where decisions are tested against multiple viewpoints. This leads to more accurate decisions and helps identify blind spots and risks earlier.
Reduced risks and smoother conflict resolution: most project risks stem more from people than from technology. Issues such as poor communication, resistance to change, or conflicting priorities can be anticipated and mitigated through a solid stakeholder management plan. This proactive approach helps minimize costly rework, delays, and budget overruns.
Higher success rates and long-term credibility: projects with strong stakeholder management are far more likely to achieve their objectives. Moreover, when PMOs consistently manage stakeholders well, they build a reputation for reliability and leadership that, over time, positions them as a true driver of strategic results.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Get stories like this in your inbox

How to create a Stakeholder Management Plan for Project Management? A step-by-step process

As you can see, the benefits of stakeholder management are clear: fewer misunderstandings, stronger collaboration, and ultimately, higher project success rates. But achieving these outcomes doesn’t happen overnight. It requires more than good intentions.

This is where the Stakeholder Management Plan comes in. It’s not a mere formality or one of those documents created at the start of a project that later gets buried in a shared folder. It’s a practical guide that will help you engage stakeholders systematically throughout the entire project lifecycle.

To create a Stakeholder Management Plan, you should follow these steps:

1. Identify and profile your stakeholders

The first step may seem straightforward, but it’s the foundation for everything else: you need to know who your stakeholders are.

Many projects stall or fail because a critical voice was overlooked from the start. Whether it’s end users, a department indirectly affected by the project, or a regulator who enters the process too late, if they’re not accounted for early on, the entire initiative can be put at risk.

To prevent this, start by listing all potential stakeholders. Don’t limit yourself to the obvious names and roles: include anyone who might be impacted, directly or indirectly. Review the project charter, map decision-making chains within the organization, and run brainstorming sessions within the PMO or project teams to ensure all stakeholders are captured.

Once identified, you need to profile them—that is, gather information that will guide how you engage with them. This includes:

Their role in the project or organization.
Level of influence: how much decision-making power they hold.
Interests and concerns: what matters most to them.
Preferred communication style (executive summaries, dashboards, check-ins, presentations, etc.).

You can store this information in a stakeholder register, ensuring it’s accessible whenever needed.

2. Analyze and prioritize their influence and needs

Not all stakeholders can or should be managed the same way. Each has a different level of influence. Some can decide whether a project moves forward or not, while others simply need periodic updates.

That’s why analyzing and prioritizing stakeholders is essential. The most effective tool for this process is the Power/Interest Matrix, which classifies stakeholders along two dimensions:

Power: their ability to influence decisions, project outcomes, or resource allocation.
Interest: their level of concern or involvement in the project.

Once you assess each stakeholder’s power and interest, you can categorize them into four groups:

Group	Objective	Description
High power, high interest	Manage closely	Key players, such as sponsors, executives, or customers, who have both the authority and motivation to influence the project.
High power, low interest	Keep satisfied	Includes regulators or board members. They don’t want all the details, but they do expect updates that give them confidence.
Low power, high interest	Keep informed	Often end users or operational staff. They care deeply about the outcome but don’t influence strategic decisions.
Low power, low interest	Monitor	Peripheral groups or the general public, who only need occasional updates.

3. Develop a targeted engagement and communication strategy

With stakeholders identified and prioritized, the next step is to decide how you will engage them. To do this, you need a communication strategy that ensures each stakeholder receives the right information, in the right format, at the right time.

This strategy should answer three key questions:

1. What is the objective? This could include several goals: gathering feedback, managing expectations, keeping stakeholders informed, etc.

2. How will communication take place? Choose the most appropriate channels for each group. For example:

Dashboards or executive summaries for senior leadership.
Weekly meetings for project teams.
Formal reports for external stakeholders.

3. When and how often will communication occur? Define the cadence for each group—whether that means weekly check-ins, milestone updates, monthly steering committee meetings, and so on.

It’s also important to tailor the content for each stakeholder, providing exactly the information they need. No more, no less.

At the same time, create opportunities for stakeholders to ask questions, raise concerns, and contribute ideas. This not only strengthens your relationship with them but also helps surface risks and gather insights that might otherwise go unnoticed.

4. Assign responsibilities

One of the most common mistakes is assuming that stakeholder communication is solely the responsibility of the Project Manager. In reality, it’s a shared responsibility in which PMOs, project teams, and Project Managers all have a role to play.

To define these responsibilities clearly, it’s recommended to use a RACI Matrix. This framework ensures that each stakeholder understands their role in specific tasks and decisions:

Responsible: the person who executes the work or leads the communication.
Accountable: the individual ultimately responsible for the outcome and ensures it is delivered correctly.
Consulted: those who must be consulted before decisions are made.
Informed: those who need to stay updated on progress, even if they don’t directly influence the outcome.

By applying a RACI Matrix, you not only prevent misunderstandings and duplicated efforts, but also build confidence among stakeholders, who will see that the project is well-governed, and that responsibilities are clearly defined.

5. Define processes for issue escalation and conflict resolution

Even when responsibilities are clearly defined, conflicts and issues may still arise. Stakeholders may have conflicting priorities, or tensions may emerge when expectations don’t align. These situations are, in most cases, unavoidable, and they require a response that is swift, transparent, and constructive.

Every stakeholder management plan should include a clear escalation path that specifies:

Which issues can be resolved directly between project teams and the Project Manager.
Which issues should be escalated if not resolved initially, and to whom.
Which persistent or high-impact conflicts must be elevated to the project sponsor or steering committee.

A proactive approach to issue and conflict management not only prevents delays and cost overruns, but also builds stakeholder confidence, assuring them that their concerns will not be ignored.

6. Implement, track and adapt continuously

Finally, your stakeholder management plan should evolve at the same pace as the organization to ensure it continues delivering value over time. Stakeholders are not static, as their influence, level of interest, and even their expectations can change. Therefore, you should:

Regularly monitor stakeholder perception through check-ins, surveys, or informal conversations.
Review and update the stakeholder register whenever necessary.
Adjust communication and engagement strategies if the role of one or more stakeholders shifts (e.g., someone with low interest becoming a critical player).
Capture lessons learned on which communication approaches worked and which didn’t, to continuously improve the process.

This iterative approach ensures that the plan never becomes obsolete. It also builds credibility with stakeholders, as they perceive that their feedback actively shapes how they are managed, reinforcing both trust and commitment.

Turn stakeholders into project champions with Triskell

Request a demo of Triskell today and learn how it turns stakeholder management into a driver of project success.

Common challenges in stakeholder management and best practices to address them

Designing a stakeholder management plan is only the first step. The real test comes in day-to-day execution. Why? Because stakeholders are people. And people are unpredictable. Even with the most detailed communication plan and stakeholder management processes, challenges will inevitably arise sooner or later.

Below are the most common challenges in managing project stakeholders, along with best practices to address them effectively.

1. Conflicting stakeholder priorities

Not all stakeholders want the same thing. While a project sponsor may push to accelerate delivery to meet strategic goals, a department head might be more concerned about resource availability. These conflicts of interest and power struggles can seriously compromise project performance and create organizational tension—making effective management essential.

How to address this challenge

Establish structured prioritization processes that promote transparency. Tools like prioritization matrices or the MoSCoW framework help visualize priorities clearly.
Organize workshops where different stakeholders can present their perspectives and negotiate agreements or compromises. If differences remain, your role as Project Manager is to keep the conversation anchored to the project’s strategic objectives, ensuring decisions serve the greater good rather than individual interests.

2. Unmanaged or unrealistic expectations

Few things create more frustration in project management than overpromising. If stakeholders expect outcomes that don’t align with the defined scope, budget, or timelines, disappointment is inevitable.

How to address this challenge

Be clear and honest from the beginning. Set realistic timelines, budgets, and deliverables, and communicate transparently about what is and isn’t achievable. This builds credibility even when you must deliver difficult messages.
Provide regular updates with metrics tied to project progress to keep expectations grounded.

3. Lack of stakeholder commitment

Some stakeholders may be skeptical about the value of an initiative or view it as a threat to their own priorities. Without their commitment, they may become active blockers—refusing to collaborate or even withholding key resources.

How to address this challenge

Show each stakeholder how the project directly benefits them. For instance, explain to department heads how an initiative will reduce team workload in the future, while demonstrating to executives how it aligns with the organization’s strategic KPIs.
Involve resistant stakeholders in decision-making. When they feel their voice matters, they are more likely to shift from being obstacles to becoming allies.

GOVERNANCE MATURITY TEST

Assess the maturity of your PPM processes in 10 minutes

6 management areas, personalized score, and recommendations.

4. Resistance to change

Projects often involve adopting new applications, implementing processes, or changing ways of working. These are precisely the types of initiatives that trigger the strongest resistance to change.

This reaction is natural. Fear of job loss, disruption of daily routines, or loss of control can drive stakeholders to oppose transformation projects—sometimes subtly, sometimes openly.

How to address this challenge

Identify the root causes of resistance. It could be fear of redundancy, lack of skills, or cultural attachment to “the way things have always been done,”, among others.
Adapt your strategy based on the underlying cause. Offer training to employees, run pilot tests, or hold Q&A sessions to address concerns.

5. Information silos

When information is scattered across teams, tools, and departments, stakeholders end up working with inconsistent data. This leads to:

Inconsistent decision-making.
Duplicated efforts.
Loss of efficiency.

How to address this challenge

Centralize all project and portfolio management information in a PPM software solution (e.g., Triskell), where all stakeholders can access real-time updates, documentation, and project dashboards.

This reduces confusion and ensures decisions are based on consistent, reliable data.

How Triskell Software supports your stakeholder management strategy

As an organization grows and begins to manage more and more projects, relying on traditional manual methods (spreadsheets, endless email chains, or scattered documentation) quickly becomes unsustainable. Misaligned data, inconsistent reports, fragmented communications… this is how even the best-designed stakeholder management plan can lose effectiveness and put project outcomes at risk.

In this context, a PPM solution like Triskell Software can make a real difference, helping PMOs and Project Managers to:

Centralize communications: Triskell provides a single platform where stakeholders can access up-to-date information, reports, and all project documentation.
Create tailored dashboards and reports: design dashboards and reports customized for each stakeholder group. Whether it’s high-level views for executives, specific KPIs for managers, or milestone reports for external clients, Triskell puts all of this at your fingertips.
Automate alerts and notifications: configure alerts and reminders for critical milestones, task assignments, approvals, or changes.
Align the organization with strategic objectives: link any initiative—whether project, program, or product—to business-wide goals. This allows stakeholders to clearly see how each initiative connects to strategy at any time.
Integrate all data in a single interface: Triskell can integrate with corporate tools (ERP systems, CRMs, collaboration platforms), eliminating information silos.

Conclusion: stop underestimating the importance of stakeholder management

Stakeholder management isn’t just another checkbox in project portfolio management: it’s the heartbeat of successful delivery. Processes, tools, and methodologies matter, but without stakeholder trust and support, even the most well-planned projects stumble.

The real difference between failure and success lies in how we engage with people: listening to them, aligning their expectations, and transforming them from passive observers into active champions. That’s why the best project managers don’t just “manage” stakeholders — they build partnerships that endure beyond a single project.

This is exactly where Triskell Software makes a difference. By centralizing communication, tailoring dashboards, and linking every initiative to strategic objectives, Triskell helps PMOs and project managers keep stakeholders aligned and committed. Instead of chasing updates and juggling spreadsheets, you can focus on what truly matters: building partnerships that drive project and portfolio success.

Request a demo of Triskell Software

See how Triskell’s PPM solution connects strategy, execution, and stakeholder management in one platform. Request your personalized demo today.

FAQ about Stakeholder Management in Project Management

For more information on stakeholder management, what resources can you consult?

For more information on Stakeholder Management and other PPM processes, we are sure you will find these articles useful:

How to prioritize projects: best criteria and techniques for effective project prioritization.
Breaking down silos in your organization? Tips and best practices.
AI for Project Management: tools, use cases and examples of Chat GPT prompts.
IT Project Management: The ultimate handbook for leading all types of IT projects.
The ultimate guide to Scenario Analysis for PPM: how it works, examples, techniques and tools.
What is Demand Management? The definitive guide for your IT department.
Project Financial Management 101: A Comprehensive Guide for PMOs.
Resource Management in Project Management: processes, tools and techniques.
15 process improvement examples with a PPM solution.

What is the difference between stakeholder management and stakeholder engagement?

Stakeholder management is the structured process of identifying, analyzing, and planning interactions with stakeholders. Stakeholder engagement, on the other hand, emphasizes the human side, building trust, encouraging dialogue, and creating genuine partnerships. Both are essential, but engagement is what truly turns stakeholders into advocates.

How can project managers handle “difficult” stakeholders?

The best approach is empathy and proactive communication. Start by understanding their concerns and motivations. Involve them in decision-making, give them ownership of small wins, and remain transparent about constraints. Turning resistance into collaboration often requires patience but pays off in the long run.

What’s the biggest mistake organizations make in stakeholder management?

Treating it as a one-time exercise. Many PMOs identify stakeholders at the start of a project but fail to maintain ongoing dialogue. Stakeholders are always evolving. If engagement doesn’t evolve with them, misunderstandings and resistance are almost guaranteed.